Skip to content

Republicans in Ohio Sure Are Classy!

April 27, 2010

Wow.  Somehow I had completely missed this.  According to Representative Betty Sutton (D-Ohio):

Tom Ganley, who wants to take my place in Congress, has shown his true colors by funding a campaign mailer that reads: ‘Let’s take Betty Sutton out of the House and send her back to the kitchen.

Wow.  Classy.

According to a news blip on the Daily Radar, the Medina County Republican Executive Committee was responsible for the flier, and the committee has since issued an apology.  Sutton has refused to accept the apology.  Good for her.  I’m certain that the committee knew exactly what they were doing when they issued the ad; and I’m just as certain that they aren’t actually sorry for it. After all, the county’s chairman, Bill Heck, told Talking Points Memo that

“I’m not sure that it was intended — in fact I’m positive that it was not in intended to be sexist.  In fact, it was speaking to the people of that district, and not intended to be a sexist comment.

I mean, I have a wife that was elected twice to county office, and once was a judge. I’ve got two daughters.  It was not authored by me, but it was published by the Republican Party of Medina County. We are just trying to get the attention of the voters. It is rhetoric that I think is very common in all elections, of sending people somewhere — either to the House or back from the House. And we certainly apologize for any offense that anyone would take from this.”

He has daughters!  Listen to him, ladies!  He has daughters!  Also, he’s sure that the committee wasn’t intending to be offensive.  Rather, they were just “speaking to the people of that district.”  So in other words, he’s saying that they themselves aren’t sexist.  But their constituents sure are!

Your intentions, or the committee’s intentions, don’t matter, Mr. Heck.  What the flier said IS SEXIST.  No argument.  Thanks.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. April 27, 2010 10:18 am

    So, what Heck (talk about an appropriate name) was saying was that is was only a sexist comment to the people of that district. Or, it was okay because they were just trying to get the attention of the voters. Or,
    What exactly was his excuse?

    • April 27, 2010 7:26 pm

      I wondered that too, Poker Face. It’s hard to tell exactly what he’s going for here… but it sounds to me like he’s saying “WE’RE not the ones who are sexist! It’s just our CONSTITUENTS who are sexist!” Like that makes it better somehow?

      Also, he has daughters. Did I mention that? Because he really wants us to know about them. Kind of reminds me of Scott Brown.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: